Soul, Self, and
Society: A Postmodern Anthropology for Mission in a Postmodern World
By Michael Rynkiewich.
Eugene, OR.: Cascade Books, 2011. Pp. xi, 296. $33.
Michael Rynkiewich is one of the most insightful authors of
missiological anthropology that many missiologists have never read. Until this
book, Rynkiewich’s writing was notably found in two extraordinarily good
articles appearing Missiology in 2002
and 2003, in which he critiqued common anthropological models and theories employed
in missiology. In 2011, he published another excellent article in Mission Studies, addressing the
importance of postmodern anthropology for contemporary missiology. Knowing
these articles, I had high expectations coming to his book. Although Soul, Self, and Society did not meet all
my hopes, it provides a helpful introductory textbook and a useful resource
addressing the intersection of missiology and anthropology.
The book covers most of the concepts expected of an
introduction to cultural anthropology – e.g., kinship, politics, economics –
and several often not covered, such as transnationalism and diaspora. Accounts
of his missionary work in Papua New Guinea make this a valuable introductory
book for prospective missionaries. There are a few striking omissions, such as
any discussion of gender, and a few bits that seem tacked on (such as two
paragraphs on “business as mission” and a 6 ½ page final chapter on “The
Anthropology of Christianity”), but overall the coverage is thorough.
As the author of an introductory anthropology textbook
myself, I appreciated the practical help Rynkiewich provides those in mission
work. Unfortunately, while he promises a “postmodern anthropology,” he does not
interact with contemporary theory much. The most prominent theorists typically
associated with postmodern culture theory appear briefly, if at all, and
receive no sustained attention. More striking was the absence of any reference
to the work of Robert Priest, a missiologist who has written prominent pieces
on postmodernity and anthropology. At
several points it appeared that this text has been under construction for some
time, and although published in 2011, already needs some updating. (E.g., on
page 103, Rynkiewich refers to “recent work-time studies” published in 1974.)
There is a lot in this book the mission community would do
well to absorb. Some may be frustrated that as Rynkiewich pulls missionary
anthropology out of its orbit of 1960s functionalist anthropology, he sidelines
anthropologically marginal concepts such as “worldview” and “syncretism.” Yet I
agree with Rynkiewich that for missiology to maintain a vibrant conversation
with anthropology, it must embrace contemporary theory where such concepts have
little traction. Anyone studying anthropology for missionary purposes would do
well to read this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment